- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- LV-HD240 vs NeoPix Easy 2+
La Vague LV-HD240 vs Philips NeoPix Easy 2+
What LV-HD240 does better (1) and where NeoPix Easy 2+ wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.7Setup & placement5.8
Why is LV-HD240 better than NeoPix Easy 2+?
- Largest image size168″ vs 60″2.8×
Why is NeoPix Easy 2+ better than LV-HD240?
- Automatic keystone correctionNo · LV-HD240: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | 2,000 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.4:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 3.1 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 24″ |
| Largest image size | 168″ | 60″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 6 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | Yes | Yes |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 42 W |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 0.86 kg |
| Width | — | 207 mm |
| Height | — | 84 mm |
| Depth | — | 150 mm |
| Colours | White | Silver, Black |
