How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. LV-HD320 Full HD 2500lm vs NeoPix 444

La Vague LV-HD320 Full HD 2500lm vs Philips NeoPix 444

What LV-HD320 Full HD 2500lm does better (0) and where NeoPix 444 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

La Vague LV-HD320 Full HD 2500lm
La Vague · 2026LV-HD320 Full HD 2500lm
0 advantages≈ US$150
vs
Philips NeoPix 444
Philips · 2026NeoPix 444
4.1Score
4 advantages≈ US$170
Higher score
3.2Setup & placement8.7

Why is LV-HD320 Full HD 2500lm better than NeoPix 444?

LV-HD320 Full HD 2500lm has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is NeoPix 444 better than LV-HD320 Full HD 2500lm?

  1. Light source life2,500 h vs 30,000 h12×
  2. Automatic keystone correctionNo · LV-HD320 Full HD 2500lm: Yes
  3. HDMI inputs0 vs 1
  4. Audio outputNo · LV-HD320 Full HD 2500lm: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NeoPix 444Philips NeoPix 444≈ US$1704.1
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)—
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—500 lm
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)2,500 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—1,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.2:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.66 m—
Largest image size—100″
Lens shiftNone—
Autofocus—Yes
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoYes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—10 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformFire TV—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Netflix (officially licensed)Yes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs01
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life2,500 h30,000 h
Design & noise
ColoursBlackWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare