How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. LV-HD500 vs NeoPix 520

La Vague LV-HD500 vs Philips NeoPix 520

What LV-HD500 does better (1) and where NeoPix 520 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

La Vague LV-HD500
La Vague · 2022LV-HD500
1 advantage≈ US$300
vs
Philips NeoPix 520
Philips · 2022NeoPix 520
8.6Score
2 advantages≈ US$480
Higher score
2.5Setup & placement2.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

LV-HD500NeoPix 520
310 × 110240274 × 107294
LV-HD500NeoPix 520Difference
Height110 mm107 mm+3 mm
Width310 mm274 mm+36 mm
Depth240 mm294 mm−54 mm
Weight2.6 kg2.4 kg+0.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is LV-HD500 better than NeoPix 520?

  1. Largest image size200″ vs 100″2×

Why is NeoPix 520 better than LV-HD500?

  1. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1 vs 3,000:13×
  2. Weight2.6 kg vs 2.4 kg+8%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NeoPix 520Philips NeoPix 520≈ US$4808.6
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)3,400 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:13,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.43:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—3.17 m
Smallest image size40″—
Largest image size200″100″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusNoNo
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—14 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs22
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputYesNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—100 W
Light source life30,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight2.6 kg2.4 kg
Width310 mm274 mm
Height110 mm107 mm
Depth240 mm294 mm
ColoursSilverBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare