- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- LPJ-500 vs TX-177
Lenco LPJ-500 vs Technaxx TX-177
What LPJ-500 does better (2) and where TX-177 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is LPJ-500 better than TX-177?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1 vs 1,500:12×
- Power consumption48 W vs 70 W+46%
Why is TX-177 better than LPJ-500?
- Light source life30,000 h vs 40,000 h+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | 2,800 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 3,000:1 | 1,500:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | — | 50″ |
| Largest image size | — | 200″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | No | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 48 W | 70 W |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 40,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 1.36 kg |
| Width | — | 187 mm |
| Height | — | 96 mm |
| Depth | — | 234 mm |
| Colours | Blue | White |
