- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- LPJ-900WH vs NeoPix 150
Lenco LPJ-900WH vs Philips NeoPix 150
What LPJ-900WH does better (1) and where NeoPix 150 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
2.4Picture2.2
Why is LPJ-900WH better than NeoPix 150?
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
Why is NeoPix 150 better than LPJ-900WH?
- Wi-FiNo · LPJ-900WH: Yes
- Weight2 kg vs 1.85 kg+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | — | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | LED | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 250 lm | 250 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 1,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.66 m |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 6 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 1.4 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 50,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 2 kg | 1.85 kg |
| Width | — | 126 mm |
| Height | — | 208 mm |
| Depth | — | 144 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
