- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- LPJ-900WH vs NeoPix 160
Lenco LPJ-900WH vs Philips NeoPix 160
What LPJ-900WH does better (2) and where NeoPix 160 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.4Picture2.4
Why is LPJ-900WH better than NeoPix 160?
- Light source life50,000 h vs 30,000 h+67%
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
Why is NeoPix 160 better than LPJ-900WH?
- Weight2 kg vs 1.23 kg+63%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 250 lm | 250 lm |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 5 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Google TV |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | No | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Chromecast built-in | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 50,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 2 kg | 1.23 kg |
| Width | — | 207 mm |
| Height | — | 147 mm |
| Depth | — | 171 mm |
| Colours | White | Black |
