How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. LPJ-900WH vs NeoPix 530

Lenco LPJ-900WH vs Philips NeoPix 530

What LPJ-900WH does better (2) and where NeoPix 530 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Lenco LPJ-900WH
Lenco · 2024LPJ-900WH
2 advantages≈ US$170
vs
Philips NeoPix 530
Philips · 2023NeoPix 530
8.5Score
1 advantage≈ US$250
Higher score

Why is LPJ-900WH better than NeoPix 530?

  1. Light source life50,000 h vs 30,000 h+67%
  2. Weight2 kg vs 2.7 kg+35%

Why is NeoPix 530 better than LPJ-900WH?

  1. Wi-FiNo · LPJ-900WH: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Lenco LPJ-900WHLenco LPJ-900WH≈ US$170
Philips NeoPix 530Philips NeoPix 530≈ US$2508.5
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—3,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.43:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—3.17 m
Largest image size—100″
Lens shift—None
Autofocus—No
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—14 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Wi-FiNoYes
BluetoothYesYes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs22
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—100 W
Light source life50,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight2 kg2.7 kg
Width—274 mm
Height—107 mm
Depth—294 mm
ColoursWhiteBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare