- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- CineBeam PU700R vs NeoPix 113
LG CineBeam PU700R vs Philips NeoPix 113
What CineBeam PU700R does better (4) and where NeoPix 113 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
Why is CineBeam PU700R better than NeoPix 113?
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Built-in speakers (total output)5 W vs 3 W+67%
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Largest image size120″ vs 65″+85%
Why is NeoPix 113 better than CineBeam PU700R?
NeoPix 113 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | — |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 1,000 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 150,000:1 | — |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| HDR formats | HDR10 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.2:1 | 1.47:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.66 m | 3.25 m |
| Smallest image size | 60″ | 65″ |
| Largest image size | 120″ | 65″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 5 W | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | webOS (LG) | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| AirPlay | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | — | 1 |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | — | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 0.4 kg |
| Width | 164 mm | — |
| Height | 307 mm | — |
| Depth | 144 mm | — |
| Colours | White | Black |
