- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- HY300-A vs PicoPix Micro+
LQWELL HY300-A vs Philips PicoPix Micro+
What HY300-A does better (4) and where PicoPix Micro+ wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.6Picture2.1
Why is HY300-A better than PicoPix Micro+?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)10,000:1 vs 600:116.7×
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
- Largest image size130″ vs 70″+86%
Why is PicoPix Micro+ better than HY300-A?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)120 lm vs 150 lm+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Light source | — | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 120 lm | 150 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 10,000:1 | 600:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.66 m |
| Largest image size | 130″ | 70″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 3 W | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | Own / Linux platform |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 0.21 kg |
| Width | — | 76 mm |
| Height | — | 34 mm |
| Depth | — | 74 mm |
| Colours | — | Black |
