- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- HY300 PRO+ vs NeoPix 200
Magcubic HY300 PRO+ vs Philips NeoPix 200
What HY300 PRO+ does better (1) and where NeoPix 200 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.6Picture4.7
5.7Setup & placement2.0
Why is HY300 PRO+ better than NeoPix 200?
- Largest image size130″ vs 60″2.2×
Why is NeoPix 200 better than HY300 PRO+?
- Resolution (on screen)1024 × 768 (XGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Light source life10,000 h vs 20,000 h2×
- Native panel resolution1024 × 768 (XGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1024 × 768 (XGA) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1024 × 768 (XGA) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.2:1 | 1.35:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.66 m | 2.99 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 24″ |
| Largest image size | 130″ | 60″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | Android (not TV-certified) |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 10,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 30 dB | — |
| Weight | — | 1.35 kg |
| Colours | White | Silver, Black, White |
