How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. HY320 vs NeoPix 106

Magcubic HY320 vs Philips NeoPix 106

What HY320 does better (2) and where NeoPix 106 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Magcubic HY320
Magcubic · 2024HY320
2 advantages≈ US$120
vs
Philips NeoPix 106
Philips · 2026NeoPix 106
4.0Score
2 advantages≈ US$110
Higher score

Why is HY320 better than NeoPix 106?

  1. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)10,000:1 vs 500:120×
  2. Largest image size150″ vs 50″3×

Why is NeoPix 106 better than HY320?

  1. Light source life10,000 h vs 30,000 h3×
  2. Audio outputNo · HY320: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Magcubic HY320Magcubic HY320≈ US$120
Philips NeoPix 106Philips NeoPix 106≈ US$1104.0
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technology—LCD (single panel)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—60 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)10,000:1500:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.1:11.2:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.44 m2.66 m
Largest image size150″50″
Lens shift—None
Autofocus—No
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—Yes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—2 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life10,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise30 dB—
Weight—0.51 kg
Width—158 mm
Height—73 mm
Depth—121 mm
ColoursBlackWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare