How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. HY320 vs Neopix 130

Magcubic HY320 vs Philips Neopix 130

What HY320 does better (2) and where Neopix 130 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Magcubic HY320
Magcubic · 2024HY320
2 advantages≈ US$120
vs
Philips Neopix 130
Philips · 2024Neopix 130
5.8Score
2 advantages≈ US$150
Higher score

Why is HY320 better than Neopix 130?

  1. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)10,000:1 vs 500:120×
  2. Largest image size150″ vs 70″2.1×

Why is Neopix 130 better than HY320?

  1. Light source life10,000 h vs 30,000 h3×
  2. Audio outputNo · HY320: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Magcubic HY320Magcubic HY320≈ US$120
Philips Neopix 130Philips Neopix 130≈ US$1505.8
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technology—DLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—120 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)10,000:1500:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.1:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.44 m—
Largest image size150″70″
Lens shift—None
Autofocus—Yes
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—Yes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—10 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life10,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise30 dB—
Weight—1.5 kg
Width—141 mm
Height—162 mm
Depth—123 mm
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare