- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- HY320 vs NeoPix 200
Magcubic HY320 vs Philips NeoPix 200
What HY320 does better (2) and where NeoPix 200 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
Why is HY320 better than NeoPix 200?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)10,000:1 vs 3,000:13.3×
- Largest image size150″ vs 60″2.5×
Why is NeoPix 200 better than HY320?
- Light source life10,000 h vs 20,000 h2×
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Audio outputNo · HY320: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 10,000:1 | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.1:1 | 1.35:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.44 m | 2.99 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 24″ |
| Largest image size | 150″ | 60″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | Android (not TV-certified) |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 10,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 30 dB | — |
| Weight | — | 1.35 kg |
| Colours | Black | Silver, Black, White |
