How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. HY320 vs TX-177

Magcubic HY320 vs Technaxx TX-177

What HY320 does better (1) and where TX-177 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Magcubic HY320
Magcubic · 2024HY320
1 advantage≈ US$120
vs
Technaxx TX-177
Technaxx · 2022TX-177
6.7Score
4 advantages≈ US$130
Higher score
2.7Noise, lifetime & portability7.8

Why is HY320 better than TX-177?

  1. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)10,000:1 vs 1,500:16.7×

Why is TX-177 better than HY320?

  1. Light source life10,000 h vs 40,000 h4×
  2. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
  3. Audio outputNo · HY320: Yes
  4. Largest image size150″ vs 200″+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Magcubic HY320Magcubic HY320≈ US$120
Technaxx TX-177Technaxx TX-177≈ US$1306.7
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)10,000:11,500:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.1:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.44 m—
Smallest image size—50″
Largest image size150″200″
Lens shift—None
Autofocus—No
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—3 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—70 W
Light source life10,000 h40,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise30 dB—
Weight—1.36 kg
Width—187 mm
Height—96 mm
Depth—234 mm
ColoursBlackWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare