How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. X7 vs Neopix 130

Magcubic X7 vs Philips Neopix 130

What X7 does better (0) and where Neopix 130 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Magcubic X7
Magcubic · 2026X7
0 advantages≈ US$170
vs
Philips Neopix 130
Philips · 2024Neopix 130
5.8Score
3 advantages≈ US$150
Higher score
4.4Setup & placement7.5

Why is X7 better than Neopix 130?

X7 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Neopix 130 better than X7?

  1. Automatic keystone correctionNo · X7: Yes
  2. Wi-FiNo · X7: Yes
  3. Audio outputNo · X7: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Magcubic X7Magcubic X7≈ US$170
Philips Neopix 130Philips Neopix 130≈ US$1505.8
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technology—DLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—120 lm
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)1,000 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—500:1
Lens & placement
Largest image size—70″
Lens shiftNoneNone
Autofocus—Yes
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoYes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—10 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-FiNoYes
BluetoothYesYes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life—30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight—1.5 kg
Width—141 mm
Height—162 mm
Depth—123 mm
ColoursBlue—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare