- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Mars II Pro vs NeoPix 100
Nebula Mars II Pro vs Philips NeoPix 100
What Mars II Pro does better (2) and where NeoPix 100 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is Mars II Pro better than NeoPix 100?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
Why is NeoPix 100 better than Mars II Pro?
NeoPix 100 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | — | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 500 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.47:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 3.25 m |
| Largest image size | — | 65″ |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 6 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | — | 1 |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | Yes |
| Audio output | — | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 500 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 0.8 kg |
| Width | — | 158 mm |
| Height | — | 205 mm |
| Depth | — | 78 mm |
| Colours | Black | White |
