- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- GT2000HDR vs GT3500HDR
Optoma GT2000HDR vs Optoma GT3500HDR
What GT2000HDR does better (3) and where GT3500HDR wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is GT2000HDR better than GT3500HDR?
- Light source life30,000 h vs 3,500 h8.6×
- Largest image size300″ vs 100″3×
- Audio outputYes · GT3500HDR: No
Why is GT3500HDR better than GT2000HDR?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,500 lm vs 3,800 lm+9%
- Ethernet (LAN)No · GT2000HDR: Yes
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)300,000:1 vs 500,000:1+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Laser | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 3,500 lm | 3,800 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 300,000:1 | 500,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HLG |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 0.5:1 | 2:1 |
| Throw type | Short throw (0.4–1.0:1) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 1.11 m | 4.43 m |
| Smallest image size | 30″ | — |
| Largest image size | 300″ | 100″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 15 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | Yes |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 139 W | — |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 3,500 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 34 dB | 34 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 32 dB | 27 dB |
| Weight | 3 kg | — |
| Width | 274 mm | — |
| Height | 114 mm | — |
| Depth | 216 mm | — |
| Colours | White | — |
