- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- GT2200HDR vs UZ38X
Optoma GT2200HDR vs Optoma UZ38X
What GT2200HDR does better (0) and where UZ38X wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Why is GT2200HDR better than UZ38X?
GT2200HDR has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is UZ38X better than GT2200HDR?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,300 lm vs 3,800 lm+15%
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)500,000:1 vs 1,500,000:13×
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Audio outputNo · GT2200HDR: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | LED | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 3,300 lm | 3,800 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 500,000:1 | 1,500,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| HDR formats | HDR10 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 2:1 | 1.21:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 1.59:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 4.43 m | 2.68 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 28″ |
| Largest image size | — | 300″ |
| Optical zoom | — | 1.3× |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 15 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| HDMI version | 2 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 33 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 28 dB |
| Weight | — | 3.4 kg |
| Width | — | 238 mm |
| Height | — | 130 mm |
| Depth | — | 215 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
