How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. HZ40HDR vs NeoPix 750

Optoma HZ40HDR vs Philips NeoPix 750

What HZ40HDR does better (2) and where NeoPix 750 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Optoma HZ40HDR
Optoma · 2023HZ40HDR
8.6Score
2 advantages≈ US$660
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix 750
Philips · 2024NeoPix 750
0 advantages≈ US$610
Dimensions

Size comparison

HZ40HDRNeoPix 750
274 × 114216305 × 119319
HZ40HDRNeoPix 750Difference
Height114 mm119 mm−5 mm
Width274 mm305 mm−31 mm
Depth216 mm319 mm−103 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is HZ40HDR better than NeoPix 750?

  1. Largest image size300″ vs 120″2.5×
  2. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×

Why is NeoPix 750 better than HZ40HDR?

NeoPix 750 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Optoma HZ40HDROptoma HZ40HDR≈ US$6608.6
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLPLCD (single panel)
Light sourceLaser—
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)2,000,000:1—
HDR supportYes—
3D playbackYes—
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate120 Hz—
Game / low-latency modeYes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.48:1—
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.62:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.28 m—
Smallest image size20″—
Largest image size300″120″
Optical zoom1.1×—
Lens shiftNone—
Autofocus—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—14 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs21
HDMI version2—
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption139 W—
Light source life30,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise32 dB—
Weight3 kg—
Width274 mm305 mm
Height114 mm119 mm
Depth216 mm319 mm
ColoursWhiteWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare