- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- UHZ35 vs UHZ68LV
Optoma UHZ35 vs Optoma UHZ68LV
What UHZ35 does better (3) and where UHZ68LV wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is UHZ35 better than UHZ68LV?
- Maximum refresh rate240 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Built-in speakers (total output)15 W vs 8 W+88%
- Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%
Why is UHZ68LV better than UHZ35?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,500 lm vs 5,000 lm+43%
- Audio outputNo · UHZ35: Yes
- Fan noise35 dB vs 31 dB+13%
- HDMI inputs2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | — | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 3,500 lm | 5,000 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 500,000:1 | — |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10+, HDR10, Dolby Vision |
| Dolby Vision | — | Yes |
| 3D playback | Yes | — |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 240 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Game / low-latency mode | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.2:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 1.92:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.66 m |
| Largest image size | — | 302″ |
| Optical zoom | 1.6× | 1.6× |
| Lens shift | — | Vertical |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 15 W | 8 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI version | 2 | — |
| HDMI eARC | — | Yes |
| USB port | No | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | Yes |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 35 dB | 31 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 28 dB | 25 dB |
| Weight | 4.2 kg | — |
| Width | 274 mm | — |
| Height | 114 mm | — |
| Depth | 216 mm | — |
| Colours | White | Black |
