- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- UHZ65LV vs UHZ68LV-W
Optoma UHZ65LV vs Optoma UHZ68LV-W
What UHZ65LV does better (1) and where UHZ68LV-W wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is UHZ65LV better than UHZ68LV-W?
- Fan noise29 dB vs 31 dB+7%
Why is UHZ68LV-W better than UHZ65LV?
- HDMI inputs2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Laser | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 5,000 lm | 5,000 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 2,000,000:1 | — |
| HDR support | Yes | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10+, HDR10, Dolby Vision |
| Dolby Vision | — | Yes |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | — | Yes |
| 3D playback | Yes | — |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Game / low-latency mode | Yes | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.39:1 | 1.2:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 2.22:1 | 1.92:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.08 m | 2.66 m |
| Smallest image size | 26″ | — |
| Largest image size | 302″ | 302″ |
| Optical zoom | 1.6× | 1.6× |
| Lens shift | Vertical | Vertical |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 8 W | 8 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI eARC | — | Yes |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | Yes |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 368 W | — |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 29 dB | 31 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 25 dB |
| Weight | 9.8 kg | — |
| Width | 498 mm | — |
| Height | 141 mm | — |
| Depth | 331 mm | — |
| Colours | White | White |
