How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. WU335 vs PX725HD

Optoma WU335 vs ViewSonic PX725HD

What WU335 does better (6) and where PX725HD wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Optoma WU335
Optoma · 2018WU335
4.3Score
6 advantages≈ US$790
Higher score
vs
ViewSonic PX725HD
ViewSonic · 2018PX725HD
3.6Score
1 advantage
5.4Picture3.6
3.1Noise, lifetime & portability2.6

Why is WU335 better than PX725HD?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,600 lm vs 2,000 lm+80%
  2. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  3. Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 8 W+25%
  4. Native panel resolution1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  5. Ethernet (LAN)Yes · PX725HD: No
  6. Power consumption295 W vs 310 W+5%

Why is PX725HD better than WU335?

  1. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)20,000:1 vs 22,000:1+10%
Specifications

Side by side

Optoma WU335Optoma WU335≈ US$7904.3
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLPDLP
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,600 lm2,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)20,000:122,000:1
HDR supportNo—
3D playbackYes—
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.47:1—
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.62:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.25 m—
Smallest image size29″—
Largest image size300″—
Optical zoom1.1×—
Lens shiftNone—
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W8 W
Connectivity
HDMI inputs22
HDMI version1.41.4
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)YesNo
VGA inputYesNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption295 W310 W
Light source life3,500 h3,500 h
Light source life (eco mode)10,000 h7,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise—34 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)27 dB30 dB
Weight2.93 kg2.94 kg
Width316 mm—
Height108 mm—
Depth244 mm—
ColoursWhiteWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare