- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- GamePix 800 vs GamePix 900
Philips GamePix 800 vs Philips GamePix 900
What GamePix 800 does better (2) and where GamePix 900 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.5Picture4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
GamePix 800GamePix 900
| GamePix 800 | GamePix 900 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 99 mm | 115 mm | −16 mm |
| Width | 302 mm | 238 mm | +64 mm |
| Depth | 170 mm | 215 mm | −45 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.3 kg | +0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GamePix 800 better than GamePix 900?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)2,500 lm vs 1,000 lm2.5×
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
Why is GamePix 900 better than GamePix 800?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Weight2.7 kg vs 2.3 kg+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 2,500 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,500:1 | — |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Largest image size | — | 120″ |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 5 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | No |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.3 kg |
| Width | 302 mm | 238 mm |
| Height | 99 mm | 115 mm |
| Depth | 170 mm | 215 mm |
| Colours | — | Black |
