How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 460 vs Cube2 Pro

Philips NeoPix 460 vs Xiaomi Cube2 Pro

What NeoPix 460 does better (0) and where Cube2 Pro wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 460
Philips · 2026NeoPix 460
0 advantages≈ US$270
vs
Xiaomi Cube2 Pro
Xiaomi · 2026Cube2 Pro
6.4Score
2 advantages≈ US$200
Higher score
7.9Picture7.9

Why is NeoPix 460 better than Cube2 Pro?

NeoPix 460 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Cube2 Pro better than NeoPix 460?

  1. Light source life500 h vs 20,000 h40×
  2. Audio outputNo · NeoPix 460: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Cube2 ProXiaomi Cube2 Pro≈ US$2006.4
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)—
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)500 lm500 lm
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.2:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—2.66 m
Smallest image size—40″
Largest image size—120″
Lens shift—None
Autofocus—No
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—6 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Voice assistant—Google Assistant
Internal storage—16 GB
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life500 h20,000 h
Design & noise
Weight—0.9 kg
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare