How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 750 vs PX700HDHE

Philips NeoPix 750 vs ViewSonic PX700HDHE

What NeoPix 750 does better (2) and where PX700HDHE wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 750
Philips · 2024NeoPix 750
2 advantages≈ US$610
vs
ViewSonic PX700HDHE
ViewSonic · 2025PX700HDHE
5.1Score
2 advantages≈ US$710
Higher score

Why is NeoPix 750 better than PX700HDHE?

  1. Light source life30,000 h vs 6,000 h5×
  2. Built-in speakers (total output)14 W vs 10 W+40%

Why is PX700HDHE better than NeoPix 750?

  1. Largest image size120″ vs 300″2.5×
  2. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications

Side by side

ViewSonic PX700HDHEViewSonic PX700HDHE≈ US$7105.1
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)DLP
Light source—Lamp
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—3,700 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—22,000:1
HDR support—No
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate—120 Hz
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.49:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)—1.64:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—3.3 m
Smallest image size—30″
Largest image size120″300″
Optical zoom—2×
Lens shift—None
AutofocusNoNo
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)14 W10 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
HDMI version—1.4
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—300 W
Light source life30,000 h6,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise—31 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)—27 dB
Weight—2.4 kg
Width305 mm—
Height119 mm—
Depth319 mm—
ColoursWhiteWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare