How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 750 vs K3

Philips NeoPix 750 vs Yaber K3

What NeoPix 750 does better (0) and where K3 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 750
Philips · 2024NeoPix 750
0 advantages≈ US$610
vs
Yaber K3
Yaber · 2024K3
9.2Score
3 advantages≈ US$500
Higher score

Why is NeoPix 750 better than K3?

NeoPix 750 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is K3 better than NeoPix 750?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)14 W vs 36 W2.6×
  2. AutofocusNo · NeoPix 750: Yes
  3. Largest image size120″ vs 200″+67%
Specifications

Side by side

Yaber K3Yaber K3≈ US$5009.2
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)LCD (single panel)
Light source—LED
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)—1,600 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—15,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.2:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—2.66 m
Smallest image size—40″
Largest image size120″200″
Lens shift—None
AutofocusNoYes
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—Yes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)14 W36 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Google TV
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYes—
Chromecast built-in—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life30,000 h—
Design & noise
Weight—5.1 kg
Width305 mm—
Height119 mm—
Depth319 mm—
ColoursWhiteBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare