How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 750 vs K300s

Philips NeoPix 750 vs Yaber K300s

What NeoPix 750 does better (2) and where K300s wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 750
Philips · 2024NeoPix 750
2 advantages≈ US$610
vs
Yaber K300s
Yaber · 2024K300s
7.6Score
2 advantages≈ US$1,000
Higher score

Why is NeoPix 750 better than K300s?

  1. Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%
  2. Largest image size120″ vs 100″+20%

Why is K300s better than NeoPix 750?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)14 W vs 30 W2.1×
  2. Ethernet (LAN)No · NeoPix 750: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Yaber K300sYaber K300s≈ US$1,0007.6
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)—
Light source—Laser
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—1,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—1,500:1
Motion interpolation (MEMC)—Yes
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)—2:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—2.21 m
Largest image size120″100″
Optical zoom—2×
Lens shift—None
AutofocusNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)14 W30 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoYes
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life30,000 h20,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise—27 dB
Weight—1.8 kg
Width305 mm—
Height119 mm—
Depth319 mm—
ColoursWhiteBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare