- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix 750 vs L2s
Philips NeoPix 750 vs Yaber L2s
What NeoPix 750 does better (0) and where L2s wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
NeoPix 750L2s
| NeoPix 750 | L2s | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 119 mm | 159 mm | −40 mm |
| Width | 305 mm | 226 mm | +79 mm |
| Depth | 319 mm | 184 mm | +135 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is NeoPix 750 better than L2s?
NeoPix 750 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is L2s better than NeoPix 750?
- AutofocusNo · NeoPix 750: Yes
- Built-in speakers (total output)14 W vs 16 W+14%
- Largest image size120″ vs 150″+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | — |
| Light source | — | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 700 lm |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.38:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 3.06 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 40″ |
| Largest image size | 120″ | 150″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | No | Yes |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 14 W | 16 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Own / Linux platform |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 30,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 35 dB |
| Weight | — | 2.3 kg |
| Width | 305 mm | 226 mm |
| Height | 119 mm | 159 mm |
| Depth | 319 mm | 184 mm |
| Colours | White | White |
