How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix Ace vs Mi Smart Compact

Philips NeoPix Ace vs Xiaomi Mi Smart Compact

What NeoPix Ace does better (2) and where Mi Smart Compact wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix Ace
Philips · 2020NeoPix Ace
2 advantages≈ US$280
vs
Xiaomi Mi Smart Compact
Xiaomi · 2020Mi Smart Compact
8.0Score
1 advantage
Higher score
2.8Setup & placement5.3

Why is NeoPix Ace better than Mi Smart Compact?

  1. Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%
  2. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×

Why is Mi Smart Compact better than NeoPix Ace?

  1. Audio outputNo · NeoPix Ace: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—500 lm
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)4,200 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.4:11.2:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.1 m2.66 m
Smallest image size20″60″
Largest image size120″120″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusNo—
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—10 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Voice assistant—Google Assistant
Internal storage—16 GB
Connectivity
HDMI inputs21
USB portNoYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputYesNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life30,000 h20,000 h
Light source life (eco mode)—25,000 h
Design & noise
Weight—1.3 kg
Width—150 mm
Height—115 mm
Depth—150 mm
ColoursSilver, BlackWhite, Grey
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare