How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix Ultra 2+ vs TYY0013-DE

Philips NeoPix Ultra 2+ vs TopVision TYY0013-DE

What NeoPix Ultra 2+ does better (3) and where TYY0013-DE wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix Ultra 2+
Philips · 2022NeoPix Ultra 2+
5.3Score
3 advantages
Higher score
vs
TopVision TYY0013-DE
TopVision · 2022TYY0013-DE
4 advantages

Why is NeoPix Ultra 2+ better than TYY0013-DE?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 800 (WXGA)
  2. Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 800 (WXGA)
  3. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×

Why is TYY0013-DE better than NeoPix Ultra 2+?

  1. Light source life30,000 h vs 90,000 h3×
  2. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1 vs 9,000:13×
  3. Largest image size65″ vs 300″4.6×
  4. Weight1.2 kg vs 0.95 kg+26%
Specifications

Side by side

Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1280 × 800 (WXGA)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1280 × 800 (WXGA)
Display technology—LCD (single panel)
Light sourceLEDLED
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)—7,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:19,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.4:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.1 m—
Smallest image size24″60″
Largest image size65″300″
Lens shiftNone—
AutofocusNo—
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W—
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Netflix (officially licensed)Yes—
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
Internal storage16 GB—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs21
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputYesYes
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption100 W—
Light source life30,000 h90,000 h
Design & noise
Weight1.2 kg0.95 kg
Width220 mm—
Height90 mm—
Depth170 mm—
ColoursSilver, BlackWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare