- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix Ultra 2TV vs Halo+ GTV
Philips NeoPix Ultra 2TV vs XGIMI Halo+ GTV
What NeoPix Ultra 2TV does better (2) and where Halo+ GTV wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.3Picture2.7
Why is NeoPix Ultra 2TV better than Halo+ GTV?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1 vs 200:115×
- Audio outputYes · Halo+ GTV: No
Why is Halo+ GTV better than NeoPix Ultra 2TV?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 900 lm4.5×
- Light source life20,000 h vs 25,000 h+25%
- Weight2.4 kg vs 1.6 kg+50%
- Largest image size100″ vs 120″+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 900 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 3,000:1 | 200:1 |
| 3D playback | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.31:1 | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.9 m | 2.66 m |
| Largest image size | 100″ | 120″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 30 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 100 W | — |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 25,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 1.6 kg |
| Width | 315 mm | — |
| Height | 120 mm | — |
| Depth | 235 mm | — |
| Colours | Silver, Black | Grey |
