How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix Ultra 2TV vs K3

Philips NeoPix Ultra 2TV vs Yaber K3

What NeoPix Ultra 2TV does better (1) and where K3 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix Ultra 2TV
Philips · 2021NeoPix Ultra 2TV
5.0Score
1 advantage≈ US$460
vs
Yaber K3
Yaber · 2024K3
9.2Score
4 advantages≈ US$500
Higher score
2.0Setup & placement8.1
9.7Smart features & sound9.4

Why is NeoPix Ultra 2TV better than K3?

  1. Weight2.4 kg vs 5.1 kg2.1×

Why is K3 better than NeoPix Ultra 2TV?

  1. AutofocusNo · NeoPix Ultra 2TV: Yes
  2. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1 vs 15,000:15×
  3. Largest image size100″ vs 200″2×
  4. Built-in speakers (total output)30 W vs 36 W+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Yaber K3Yaber K3≈ US$5009.2
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technology—LCD (single panel)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm—
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)—1,600 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:115,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.31:11.2:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.9 m2.66 m
Smallest image size—40″
Largest image size100″200″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusNoYes
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—Yes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)30 W36 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)Google TV
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYes—
Chromecast built-in—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputYesNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption100 W—
Light source life20,000 h—
Design & noise
Weight2.4 kg5.1 kg
Width315 mm—
Height120 mm—
Depth235 mm—
ColoursSilver, BlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare