How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Apollo P50 vs K2s

ULTIMEA Apollo P50 vs Yaber K2s

What Apollo P50 does better (3) and where K2s wins (3) — every spec side by side.

ULTIMEA Apollo P50
ULTIMEA · 2023Apollo P50
6.0Score
3 advantages≈ US$270
Higher score
vs
Yaber K2s
Yaber · 2023K2s
3.8Score
3 advantages≈ US$320
2.7Picture3.1
7.2Setup & placement3.2
8.2Smart features & sound3.3

Why is Apollo P50 better than K2s?

  1. Automatic keystone correctionYes · K2s: No
  2. Built-in speakers (total output)20 W vs 10 W2×
  3. Weight2.6 kg vs 3.2 kg+23%

Why is K2s better than Apollo P50?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)700 lm vs 800 lm+14%
  2. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,500:1 vs 15,000:110×
  3. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications

Side by side

ULTIMEA Apollo P50ULTIMEA Apollo P50≈ US$2706.0
Yaber K2sYaber K2s≈ US$3203.8
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)LCD (single panel)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)700 lm800 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,500:115,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.4:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.1 m—
Smallest image size120″—
Largest image size120″—
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusYes—
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionYesNo
Obstacle avoidanceYes—
Automatic screen fitYes—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)20 W10 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformOwn / Linux platform—
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYes—
AirPlayYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption110 W—
Light source life30,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise35 dB—
Weight2.6 kg3.2 kg
Width255 mm—
Height206 mm—
Depth170 mm—
ColoursGrey, BlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare