How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Poseidon E40 vs K2s

ULTIMEA Poseidon E40 vs Yaber K2s

What Poseidon E40 does better (3) and where K2s wins (2) — every spec side by side.

ULTIMEA Poseidon E40
ULTIMEA · 2023Poseidon E40
7.3Score
3 advantages≈ US$410
Higher score
vs
Yaber K2s
Yaber · 2023K2s
3.8Score
2 advantages≈ US$320
3.2Picture3.1
7.2Setup & placement3.2
7.7Smart features & sound3.3

Why is Poseidon E40 better than K2s?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)1,000 lm vs 800 lm+25%
  2. Automatic keystone correctionYes · K2s: No
  3. Built-in speakers (total output)20 W vs 10 W2×

Why is K2s better than Poseidon E40?

  1. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)2,000:1 vs 15,000:17.5×
  2. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications

Side by side

Yaber K2sYaber K2s≈ US$3203.8
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method4K input only (downscaled)—
Display technologyLCD (single panel)LCD (single panel)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)1,000 lm800 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)2,000:115,000:1
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.23:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.72 m—
Smallest image size120″—
Largest image size120″—
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusYes—
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionYesNo
Obstacle avoidanceYes—
Automatic screen fitYes—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)20 W10 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid TV—
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYes—
AirPlayYes—
Chromecast built-inYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption200 W—
Light source life100,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise30 dB—
Weight3.15 kg3.2 kg
Width211 mm—
Height174 mm—
Depth281 mm—
ColoursGrey, BlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare