Alternatives to LG ProBeam BF60PST

10 home cinema projectors at a similar price that compete with the ProBeam BF60PST — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

LG · 2021

ProBeam BF60PST

1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)6,000 lmLaser9.7 kg

approx. price≈ US$3,000

5.5

Cheaper

BenQ X3100i 22% cheaper Higher score

Optoma UHZ68LV +3.5 score Newest

Optoma UHZ68LV 2025

Alternatives to the ProBeam BF60PST

LG · 2021CineBeam AU810P Forza

7.3

17% pricier ≈ US$3,500

Resolution (on screen) 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)
Autofocus
Automatic keystone correction

Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) 2,700 lm vs 6,000 lm
Native panel resolution 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)

Compare with ProBeam BF60PST

LG · 2023ProBeam BU53RG

7.1

6% pricier ≈ US$3,100

Resolution (on screen) 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)
4K method 4K by pixel shifting vs 4K input only (downscaled)
Fan noise 29 dB vs 33 dB

Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) 5,000 lm vs 6,000 lm
Native panel resolution 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)

Compare with ProBeam BF60PST

Optoma · 2020UHZ65LV

8.3

9% pricier ≈ US$3,200

Resolution (on screen) 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)
Lens shift Vertical vs None
4K method 4K by pixel shifting vs 4K input only (downscaled)

Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) 5,000 lm vs 6,000 lm
Built-in speakers (total output) 8 W vs 10 W

Compare with ProBeam BF60PST

BenQ · 2022LK835ST

6.3

16% cheaper ≈ US$2,500

Resolution (on screen) 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)
Autofocus
Weight 3.4 kg vs 9.7 kg

Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) 4,000 lm vs 6,000 lm
Largest image size 120″ vs 300″

Compare with ProBeam BF60PST

LG · 2021ProBeam BU60PST

6.4

Resolution (on screen) 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)
4K method 4K by pixel shifting vs 4K input only (downscaled)

Native panel resolution 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)

Compare with ProBeam BF60PST

BenQ · 2023X3100i

8.2

22% cheaper ≈ US$2,300

Resolution (on screen) 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)
Lens shift Vertical vs None
Automatic keystone correction

Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) 3,300 lm vs 6,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) 600,000:1 vs 3,000,000:1

Compare with ProBeam BF60PST

InFocus · 2022INL2169

8.7

21% cheaper ≈ US$2,350

Built-in speakers (total output) 20 W vs 10 W
Light source life 30,000 h vs 20,000 h
Weight 4.6 kg vs 9.7 kg

Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) 4,500 lm vs 6,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) 300,000:1 vs 3,000,000:1

Compare with ProBeam BF60PST

Optoma · 2025UHZ68LV

9.0

6% pricier ≈ US$3,100

Resolution (on screen) 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)
Lens shift Vertical vs None
4K method 4K by pixel shifting vs 4K input only (downscaled)

Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) 5,000 lm vs 6,000 lm
Built-in speakers (total output) 8 W vs 10 W

Compare with ProBeam BF60PST

LG · 2024ProBeam BF60RG

5.6

16% cheaper ≈ US$2,500

Weight 9.2 kg vs 9.7 kg

Compare with ProBeam BF60PST

BenQ · 2023LK935

6.0

51% pricier ≈ US$4,500

Resolution (on screen) 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)
Lens shift Vertical and horizontal vs None
4K method 4K by pixel shifting vs 4K input only (downscaled)

Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) 5,500 lm vs 6,000 lm
Fan noise 40 dB vs 33 dB

Compare with ProBeam BF60PST