- Light source life 20,000 h vs 30,000 h
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
Alternatives to Philips NeoPix Ultra 2
10 portable & mini projectors at a similar price that compete with the NeoPix Ultra 2 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the NeoPix Ultra 2
≈ US$370
- Automatic keystone correction
- Power consumption 90 W vs 100 W
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
- Weight 1.6 kg vs 1.2 kg
≈ US$560
- Autofocus
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) 10,000:1 vs 3,000:1
- Power consumption 36 W vs 100 W
- Resolution (on screen) 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Light source life 20,000 h vs 30,000 h
≈ US$560
- Autofocus
- Automatic keystone correction
- Power consumption 90 W vs 100 W
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
- Light source life 25,000 h vs 30,000 h
≈ US$610
- Autofocus
- Automatic keystone correction
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) 100,000:1 vs 3,000:1
- Resolution (on screen) 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Light source life 20,000 h vs 30,000 h
≈ US$710
- Autofocus
- Automatic keystone correction
- Largest image size 150″ vs 120″
- Built-in speakers (total output) 6 W vs 10 W
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
- Automatic keystone correction
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) 100,000:1 vs 3,000:1
- Power consumption 65 W vs 100 W
- Light source life 20,000 h vs 30,000 h
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2