- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- C200 vs Luma 150
Acer C200 vs Kodak Luma 150
What C200 does better (1) and where Luma 150 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is C200 better than Luma 150?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 150 lm+33%
Why is Luma 150 better than C200?
Luma 150 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | — | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | LED | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 150 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 1,500:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.15:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.55 m | — |
| Largest image size | — | 150″ |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | — | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 29 dB | — |
| Weight | 0.35 kg | — |
| Width | 110 mm | — |
| Height | 30 mm | — |
| Depth | 120 mm | — |
