- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- C200 vs ML1050ST+
Acer C200 vs Optoma ML1050ST+
What C200 does better (1) and where ML1050ST+ wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
C200ML1050ST+
| C200 | ML1050ST+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 30 mm | 57 mm | −27 mm |
| Width | 110 mm | 112 mm | −2 mm |
| Depth | 120 mm | 123 mm | −3 mm |
| Weight | 0.4 kg | 0.4 kg | −0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C200 better than ML1050ST+?
- Weight0.35 kg vs 0.42 kg+20%
Why is ML1050ST+ better than C200?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 1,000 lm5×
- Fan noise29 dB vs 22 dB+32%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | — | 1280 × 800 (WXGA) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 1280 × 800 (WXGA) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 20,000:1 |
| HDR support | — | No |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 85 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.15:1 | 0.8:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Short throw (0.4–1.0:1) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.55 m | 1.77 m |
| Largest image size | — | 100″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 1.4 |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | Yes |
| Audio output | — | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | — |
| Power consumption | — | 77 W |
| Light source life | — | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 29 dB | 22 dB |
| Weight | 0.35 kg | 0.42 kg |
| Width | 110 mm | 112 mm |
| Height | 30 mm | 57 mm |
| Depth | 120 mm | 123 mm |
| Colours | — | White |
