- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Luma 150 vs ML1050ST+
Kodak Luma 150 vs Optoma ML1050ST+
What Luma 150 does better (1) and where ML1050ST+ wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Why is Luma 150 better than ML1050ST+?
- Largest image size150″ vs 100″+50%
Why is ML1050ST+ better than Luma 150?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)150 lm vs 1,000 lm6.7×
- Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p) vs 1280 × 800 (WXGA)
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,500:1 vs 20,000:113.3×
- Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p) vs 1280 × 800 (WXGA)
- Audio outputNo · Luma 150: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 854 × 480 (480p) | 1280 × 800 (WXGA) |
| Native panel resolution | 854 × 480 (480p) | 1280 × 800 (WXGA) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | — | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 150 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,500:1 | 20,000:1 |
| HDR support | — | No |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 85 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 0.8:1 |
| Throw type | — | Short throw (0.4–1.0:1) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 1.77 m |
| Largest image size | 150″ | 100″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 1.4 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | Yes |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 77 W |
| Light source life | — | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 22 dB |
| Weight | — | 0.42 kg |
| Width | — | 112 mm |
| Height | — | 57 mm |
| Depth | — | 123 mm |
| Colours | — | White |
