- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- C250i vs TX-113
Acer C250i vs Technaxx TX-113
What C250i does better (2) and where TX-113 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is C250i better than TX-113?
- Fan noise28 dB vs 54 dB+93%
- Weight0.78 kg vs 1.04 kg+33%
Why is TX-113 better than C250i?
TX-113 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 300 lm | — |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | — | 1,800 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 2,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.21:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.68 m | — |
| Smallest image size | — | 32″ |
| Largest image size | — | 176″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 4 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | No |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | Yes |
| Audio output | — | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | — |
| Power consumption | — | 50 W |
| Light source life | — | 40,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 28 dB | 54 dB |
| Weight | 0.78 kg | 1.04 kg |
| Width | — | 150 mm |
| Height | — | 86 mm |
| Depth | — | 204 mm |
| Colours | — | White |
