- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- TX-113 vs TX-127
Technaxx TX-113 vs Technaxx TX-127
What TX-113 does better (5) and where TX-127 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TX-113TX-127
| TX-113 | TX-127 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 86 mm | 75 mm | +11 mm |
| Width | 150 mm | 145 mm | +5 mm |
| Depth | 204 mm | 210 mm | −6 mm |
| Weight | 1 kg | 1.2 kg | −0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TX-113 better than TX-127?
- Built-in speakers (total output)4 W vs 3 W+33%
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)2,000:1 vs 1,000:12×
- Largest image size176″ vs 150″+17%
- Weight1.04 kg vs 1.2 kg+15%
- Power consumption50 W vs 56 W+12%
Why is TX-127 better than TX-113?
- Fan noise54 dB vs 51 dB+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | 1,800 lm | 2,000 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 2,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | 32″ | 27″ |
| Largest image size | 176″ | 150″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 4 W | 3 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | No | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 50 W | 56 W |
| Light source life | 40,000 h | 40,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 54 dB | 51 dB |
| Weight | 1.04 kg | 1.2 kg |
| Width | 150 mm | 145 mm |
| Height | 86 mm | 75 mm |
| Depth | 204 mm | 210 mm |
| Colours | White | White |
