- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- H5386BDi vs TH685P
Acer H5386BDi vs BenQ TH685P
What H5386BDi does better (0) and where TH685P wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is H5386BDi better than TH685P?
H5386BDi has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TH685P better than H5386BDi?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Built-in speakers (total output)3 W vs 5 W+67%
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Audio outputNo · H5386BDi: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Lamp | Lamp |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 4,500 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 20,000:1 | — |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.13:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 1.46:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.5 m |
| Smallest image size | 27″ | 30″ |
| Largest image size | 300″ | 300″ |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 3 W | 5 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C video input | — | Yes |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | Yes | Yes |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 4,000 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | — | 10,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 35 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 29 dB |
| Weight | — | 2.8 kg |
| Width | — | 312 mm |
| Height | — | 110 mm |
| Depth | — | 225 mm |
| Colours | — | White |
