- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- H5386BDi vs IN1039
Acer H5386BDi vs InFocus IN1039
What H5386BDi does better (1) and where IN1039 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
Why is H5386BDi better than IN1039?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,500 lm vs 4,200 lm+7%
Why is IN1039 better than H5386BDi?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)
- Built-in speakers (total output)3 W vs 16 W5.3×
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)20,000:1 vs 50,000:12.5×
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)
- Optical zoom2× vs 4×2×
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Ethernet (LAN)No · H5386BDi: Yes
- Audio outputNo · H5386BDi: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Lamp | Lamp |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 4,500 lm | 4,200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 20,000:1 | 50,000:1 |
| HDR support | — | No |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 85 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.26:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 2.09:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.79 m |
| Smallest image size | 27″ | — |
| Largest image size | 300″ | — |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 4× |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 3 W | 16 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| HDMI version | — | 1.4 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | Yes |
| VGA input | Yes | Yes |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 340 W |
| Light source life | — | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 32 dB |
| Weight | — | 3.3 kg |
| Width | — | 345 mm |
| Height | — | 261 mm |
| Depth | — | 99 mm |
| Colours | — | White |
