- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- H6542 vs H6546
Acer H6542 vs Acer H6546
What H6542 does better (4) and where H6546 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is H6542 better than H6546?
- Fan noise33 dB vs 36 dB+9%
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)13,000:1 vs 10,000:1+30%
- Weight2.4 kg vs 2.9 kg+21%
- Power consumption260 W vs 290 W+12%
Why is H6546 better than H6542?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm vs 5,200 lm+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Lamp | Lamp |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 4,000 lm | 5,200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 13,000:1 | 10,000:1 |
| HDR support | No | No |
| 3D playback | Yes | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.49:1 | 1.5:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.64:1 | 1.66:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.3 m | 3.32 m |
| Smallest image size | 27″ | 35″ |
| Largest image size | 300″ | 300″ |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 2× |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 3 W | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 260 W | 290 W |
| Light source life | 5,000 h | 5,000 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | 10,000 h | 10,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 33 dB | 36 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 29 dB | 27 dB |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.9 kg |
| Width | — | 313 mm |
| Height | — | 114 mm |
| Depth | — | 240 mm |
| Colours | White | White |
