How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. H6542 vs GamePix 900

Acer H6542 vs Philips GamePix 900

What H6542 does better (3) and where GamePix 900 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Acer H6542
Acer · 2025H6542
5.0Score
3 advantages≈ US$480
Higher score
vs
Philips GamePix 900
Philips · 2025GamePix 900
3 advantages≈ US$780
4.6Picture4.1

Why is H6542 better than GamePix 900?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm vs 1,000 lm4×
  2. Largest image size300″ vs 120″2.5×
  3. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×

Why is GamePix 900 better than H6542?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
  2. Light source life5,000 h vs 30,000 h6×
  3. Weight2.4 kg vs 2.3 kg+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Acer H6542Acer H6542≈ US$4805.0
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method—4K by pixel shifting
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLampLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm1,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)13,000:1—
HDR supportNo—
3D playbackYes—
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.49:1—
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.64:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.3 m—
Smallest image size27″—
Largest image size300″120″
Optical zoom2×—
Lens shiftNone—
AutofocusNo—
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)3 W—
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs21
USB portYesNo
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputYesNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption260 W—
Light source life5,000 h30,000 h
Light source life (eco mode)10,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise33 dB—
Fan noise (eco mode)29 dB—
Weight2.4 kg2.3 kg
Width—238 mm
Height—115 mm
Depth—215 mm
ColoursWhiteBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare