How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. H6546 vs NeoPix 750

Acer H6546 vs Philips NeoPix 750

What H6546 does better (2) and where NeoPix 750 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Acer H6546
Acer · 2024H6546
4.7Score
2 advantages≈ US$510
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix 750
Philips · 2024NeoPix 750
2 advantages≈ US$610
Dimensions

Size comparison

H6546NeoPix 750
313 × 114240305 × 119319
H6546NeoPix 750Difference
Height114 mm119 mm−5 mm
Width313 mm305 mm+8 mm
Depth240 mm319 mm−79 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is H6546 better than NeoPix 750?

  1. Largest image size300″ vs 120″2.5×
  2. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×

Why is NeoPix 750 better than H6546?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)3 W vs 14 W4.7×
  2. Light source life5,000 h vs 30,000 h6×
Specifications

Side by side

Acer H6546Acer H6546≈ US$5104.7
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLPLCD (single panel)
Light sourceLamp—
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)5,200 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)10,000:1—
HDR supportNo—
3D playbackYes—
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate120 Hz—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.5:1—
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.66:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.32 m—
Smallest image size35″—
Largest image size300″120″
Optical zoom2×—
Lens shiftNone—
AutofocusNoNo
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)3 W14 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesYes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs21
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption290 W—
Light source life5,000 h30,000 h
Light source life (eco mode)10,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise36 dB—
Fan noise (eco mode)27 dB—
Weight2.9 kg—
Width313 mm305 mm
Height114 mm119 mm
Depth240 mm319 mm
ColoursWhiteWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare