- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- H6828BD vs X9
Acer H6828BD vs TOPTRO X9
What H6828BD does better (5) and where X9 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is H6828BD better than X9?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm vs 1,600 lm2.5×
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Light source life5,000 h vs 1,600 h3.1×
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Audio outputYes · X9: No
Why is X9 better than H6828BD?
X9 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | — |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | — | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 4,000 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 50,000:1 | — |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| 3D playback | Yes | — |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 240 Hz | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.5:1 | — |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.65:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.32 m | — |
| Smallest image size | 27″ | — |
| Largest image size | 300″ | — |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 3 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| HDMI version | 1.4 | — |
| USB port | Yes | No |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 245 W | — |
| Light source life | 5,000 h | 1,600 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | 10,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 33 dB | — |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 30 dB | — |
| Weight | 2.88 kg | — |
| Width | 322 mm | — |
| Height | 94 mm | — |
| Depth | 225 mm | — |
| Colours | White | Silver, Grey |
