- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- HL6516i vs QT12
Acer HL6516i vs Acer QT12
What HL6516i does better (5) and where QT12 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is HL6516i better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Light source life20,000 h vs 6,500 h3.1×
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Audio outputYes · QT12: No
Why is QT12 better than HL6516i?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm vs 6,500 lm+62%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | Laser | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 4,000 lm | 6,500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 3,500,000:1 | — |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.5:1 | — |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.65:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.32 m | — |
| Smallest image size | 30″ | — |
| Largest image size | 300″ | — |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| HDMI version | 2 | — |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 195 W | — |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 6,500 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | 30,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 28 dB | — |
| Weight | 3.4 kg | — |
| Width | 286 mm | — |
| Height | 216 mm | — |
| Depth | 115 mm | — |
| Colours | White | White |
