- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs C3
Acer QT12 vs Hisense C3
What QT12 does better (1) and where C3 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Why is QT12 better than C3?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 2,500 lm2.6×
Why is C3 better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Light source life6,500 h vs 20,000 h3.1×
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Ethernet (LAN)No · QT12: Yes
- Audio outputNo · QT12: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | DLP |
| Light source | LED | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 2,500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 2,000:1 |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10+, HDR10, Dolby Vision |
| Dolby Vision | — | Yes |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | — | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Game / low-latency mode | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | — | 65″ |
| Largest image size | — | 300″ |
| Optical zoom | — | 1.3× |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 20 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | VIDAA |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| AirPlay | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| HDMI version | — | 2.1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | Yes |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 180 W |
| Light source life | 6,500 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 5.3 kg |
| Colours | White | Black, Grey |
