How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. M511 vs NeoPix 750

Acer M511 vs Philips NeoPix 750

What M511 does better (4) and where NeoPix 750 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Acer M511
Acer · 2022M511
9.5Score
4 advantages≈ US$680
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix 750
Philips · 2024NeoPix 750
1 advantage≈ US$610
Dimensions

Size comparison

M511NeoPix 750
313 × 114240305 × 119319
M511NeoPix 750Difference
Height114 mm119 mm−5 mm
Width313 mm305 mm+8 mm
Depth240 mm319 mm−79 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is M511 better than NeoPix 750?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Largest image size301″ vs 120″2.5×
  3. Native panel resolution1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  4. Ethernet (LAN)Yes · NeoPix 750: No

Why is NeoPix 750 better than M511?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 14 W+40%
Specifications

Side by side

Acer M511Acer M511≈ US$6809.5
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLPLCD (single panel)
Light sourceLamp—
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,300 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)10,000:1—
3D playbackYes—
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate120 Hz—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.49:1—
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.67:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.3 m—
Largest image size301″120″
Optical zoom1.12×—
Autofocus—No
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionYes—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W14 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)YesNo
VGA inputYesNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption295 W—
Light source life—30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise27 dB—
Fan noise (eco mode)24 dB—
Weight3 kg—
Width313 mm305 mm
Height114 mm119 mm
Depth240 mm319 mm
ColoursWhiteWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare